Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game vs Homescapes: Match 3 Games
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Magic Tiles 3™: Piano GameAmanotes Pte. Ltd. - Games
Homescapes: Match 3 GamesPlayrix - Games| Metric | Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game | Homescapes: Match 3 Games | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Homescapes: Match 3 Games |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.63 | 4.65 | Homescapes: Match 3 Games |
| Rating count | 801k | 2.2M | Homescapes: Match 3 Games |
| Tracked keywords | 4 | 2 | Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game |
| Category | Games | Games | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game and Homescapes: Match 3 Games are compared inside Games with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Homescapes: Match 3 Games wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game wins demand, Homescapes: Match 3 Games has deeper review volume, and Magic Tiles 3™: Piano Game has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.