Macros - Calorie Counter vs Nutrio: AI Calorie Tracker
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Macros - Calorie CounterJosmanTek - Health & Fitness
Nutrio: AI Calorie TrackerRedjan Hysa - Health & Fitness| Metric | Macros - Calorie Counter | Nutrio: AI Calorie Tracker | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Macros - Calorie Counter |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Macros - Calorie Counter |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Macros - Calorie Counter and Nutrio: AI Calorie Tracker are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Macros - Calorie Counter leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Macros - Calorie Counter wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Macros - Calorie Counter wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.