Lose It! β Calorie Counter vs Planet Fitness
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Lose It! β Calorie CounterFitNow - Health & Fitness
Planet FitnessPlanet Fitness Holdings, LLC - Health & Fitness| Metric | Lose It! β Calorie Counter | Planet Fitness | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$1.0M | $*** - opens with trial | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Revenue band | $1.0M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~362k | $*** - opens with trial | Planet Fitness |
| Download band | 362k (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.77 | 4.87 | Planet Fitness |
| Rating count | 768k | 753k | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Tracked keywords | 10 | 3 | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Lose It! β Calorie Counter and Planet Fitness are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Planet Fitness leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Lose It! β Calorie Counter wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Planet Fitness wins demand, Lose It! β Calorie Counter has deeper review volume, and Lose It! β Calorie Counter has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.