Lose It! β Calorie Counter vs Carb Manager: Keto & Macro Log
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Lose It! β Calorie Counter | Carb Manager: Keto & Macro Log | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$1.0M | $*** - opens with trial | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Revenue band | $1.0M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~362k | $*** - opens with trial | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Download band | 362k (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.77 | - | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Rating count | 768k | - | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Tracked keywords | 10 | β | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Lose It! β Calorie Counter and Carb Manager: Keto & Macro Log are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Lose It! β Calorie Counter leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Lose It! β Calorie Counter wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Lose It! β Calorie Counter wins demand, Lose It! β Calorie Counter has deeper review volume, and Lose It! β Calorie Counter has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.