looklike: swipe fashion on you vs FSD Hunter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
looklike: swipe fashion on youlookai - Shopping
FSD HunterDavid Hugenberg - Shopping| Metric | looklike: swipe fashion on you | FSD Hunter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | looklike: swipe fashion on you |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | looklike: swipe fashion on you |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.57 | 4.33 | looklike: swipe fashion on you |
| Rating count | 82 | 64 | looklike: swipe fashion on you |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Shopping | Shopping | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
looklike: swipe fashion on you and FSD Hunter are compared inside Shopping with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. looklike: swipe fashion on you leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and looklike: swipe fashion on you wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), looklike: swipe fashion on you wins demand, looklike: swipe fashion on you has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.