LinkedIn Sales Navigator vs Salesforce Field Service
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
LinkedIn Sales NavigatorLinkedIn Corporation - Business
Salesforce Field Servicesalesforce.com - Business| Metric | LinkedIn Sales Navigator | Salesforce Field Service | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | LinkedIn Sales Navigator |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.81 | - | LinkedIn Sales Navigator |
| Rating count | 51k | - | LinkedIn Sales Navigator |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
LinkedIn Sales Navigator and Salesforce Field Service are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. LinkedIn Sales Navigator leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for LinkedIn Sales Navigator in this pair. LinkedIn Sales Navigator wins demand, LinkedIn Sales Navigator has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.