Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live vs QuickBend: Conduit Bending
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Kimi - Kimi K3 is LiveMoonshot AI - Productivity
QuickBend: Conduit BendingBret Hardman - Productivity| Metric | Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live | QuickBend: Conduit Bending | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.77 | 4.82 | QuickBend: Conduit Bending |
| Rating count | 4.9k | 3.8k | Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live and QuickBend: Conduit Bending are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live wins demand, Kimi - Kimi K3 is Live has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.