Kaloria: Calorie Counter vs New EōS Fitness
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Kaloria: Calorie CounterProsperize - Health & Fitness
New EōS FitnessFitness Alliance LLC - Health & Fitness| Metric | Kaloria: Calorie Counter | New EōS Fitness | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | New EōS Fitness |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 1.86 | New EōS Fitness |
| Rating count | - | 271 | New EōS Fitness |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Kaloria: Calorie Counter and New EōS Fitness are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. New EōS Fitness leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Kaloria: Calorie Counter in this pair. New EōS Fitness wins demand, New EōS Fitness has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.