JD Sports: Exclusive rewards vs FSD Hunter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
JD Sports: Exclusive rewardsJD Sports Fashion Plc - Shopping
FSD HunterDavid Hugenberg - Shopping| Metric | JD Sports: Exclusive rewards | FSD Hunter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | JD Sports: Exclusive rewards |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.89 | 4.33 | JD Sports: Exclusive rewards |
| Rating count | 56k | 64 | JD Sports: Exclusive rewards |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Shopping | Shopping | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
JD Sports: Exclusive rewards and FSD Hunter are compared inside Shopping with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. JD Sports: Exclusive rewards leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for FSD Hunter in this pair. JD Sports: Exclusive rewards wins demand, JD Sports: Exclusive rewards has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.