iScanner: PDF Document Scanner vs Scanner App: Genius Scan
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
iScanner: PDF Document ScannerBPMobile - Business
Scanner App: Genius ScanThe Grizzly Labs - Business| Metric | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner | Scanner App: Genius Scan | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.76 | 4.90 | Scanner App: Genius Scan |
| Rating count | 1.4M | 1.3M | iScanner: PDF Document Scanner |
| Tracked keywords | 20 | 20 | Tie |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
iScanner: PDF Document Scanner and Scanner App: Genius Scan are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. iScanner: PDF Document Scanner leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and iScanner: PDF Document Scanner wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), iScanner: PDF Document Scanner wins demand, iScanner: PDF Document Scanner has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.