INCO vs Silo Markets: Points On Stocks
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
INCOInco Investimentos Coletivos - Finance
Silo Markets: Points On StocksSilo Financial LLC - Finance| Metric | INCO | Silo Markets: Points On Stocks | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Silo Markets: Points On Stocks |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Finance | Finance | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
INCO and Silo Markets: Points On Stocks are compared inside Finance with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Silo Markets: Points On Stocks leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Silo Markets: Points On Stocks in this pair. Silo Markets: Points On Stocks wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.