iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health vs Streaks
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
iCardiac: Heart Rate & HealthBEGAMOB GLOBAL LIMITED - Health & Fitness
StreaksCrunchy Bagel - Health & Fitness| Metric | iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health | Streaks | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.75 | 4.81 | Streaks |
| Rating count | 28k | 27k | iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health |
| Tracked keywords | 3 | 3 | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health and Streaks are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health wins demand, iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.