Human API β Get Paid by AI vs HotSchedules
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Human API β Get Paid by AIThe Human API - Business
HotSchedulesHotSchedules - Business| Metric | Human API β Get Paid by AI | HotSchedules | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | HotSchedules |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Human API β Get Paid by AI |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.60 | HotSchedules |
| Rating count | - | 67k | HotSchedules |
| Tracked keywords | β | β | Tie |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Human API β Get Paid by AI and HotSchedules are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Human API β Get Paid by AI leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and HotSchedules wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Human API β Get Paid by AI wins demand, HotSchedules has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.