Hims: Telehealth for Men vs epocrates: Drug Info & Pill ID
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Hims: Telehealth for MenHims & Hers - Medical
epocrates: Drug Info & Pill IDEpocrates - Medical| Metric | Hims: Telehealth for Men | epocrates: Drug Info & Pill ID | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Hims: Telehealth for Men |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.80 | 4.44 | Hims: Telehealth for Men |
| Rating count | 92k | 7.1k | Hims: Telehealth for Men |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | epocrates: Drug Info & Pill ID |
| Category | Medical | Medical | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Hims: Telehealth for Men and epocrates: Drug Info & Pill ID are compared inside Medical with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Hims: Telehealth for Men leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for epocrates: Drug Info & Pill ID in this pair. Hims: Telehealth for Men wins demand, Hims: Telehealth for Men has deeper review volume, and epocrates: Drug Info & Pill ID has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.