Grifols Plasma Donor Hub vs Monash FODMAP Diet
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Grifols Plasma Donor HubGRIFOLS SA - Medical
Monash FODMAP DietMonash University - Medical| Metric | Grifols Plasma Donor Hub | Monash FODMAP Diet | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Grifols Plasma Donor Hub |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.80 | 4.23 | Grifols Plasma Donor Hub |
| Rating count | 50k | 2.6k | Grifols Plasma Donor Hub |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Medical | Medical | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Grifols Plasma Donor Hub and Monash FODMAP Diet are compared inside Medical with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Grifols Plasma Donor Hub leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Monash FODMAP Diet in this pair. Grifols Plasma Donor Hub wins demand, Grifols Plasma Donor Hub has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.