Google Sheets vs Microsoft Excel
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Google SheetsGoogle - Productivity
Microsoft ExcelMicrosoft Corporation - Productivity| Metric | Google Sheets | Microsoft Excel | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Google Sheets |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.81 | 4.75 | Google Sheets |
| Rating count | 1.8M | 1.4M | Google Sheets |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | 2 | Tie |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Google Sheets leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Microsoft Excel in this pair. Google Sheets wins demand, Google Sheets has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.