Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app vs Evernote Scannable
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF appGoodnotes Limited - Productivity
Evernote ScannableEvernote Corporation - Productivity| Metric | Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app | Evernote Scannable | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | 2 | Tie |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app and Evernote Scannable are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Goodnotes: KI Notizen, PDF app wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.