Forms for Google Docs vs Things 3
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Forms for Google DocsAurora Innovation - Productivity
Things 3Cultured Code GmbH & Co. KG - Productivity| Metric | Forms for Google Docs | Things 3 | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Forms for Google Docs |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Forms for Google Docs |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.75 | 4.82 | Things 3 |
| Rating count | 56k | 28k | Forms for Google Docs |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Forms for Google Docs and Things 3 are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Forms for Google Docs leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Forms for Google Docs wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Forms for Google Docs wins demand, Forms for Google Docs has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.