Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie CounterFoodvisor - Health & Fitness
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic ScannerYuca - Health & Fitness| Metric | Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter | Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Tie |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.59 | 4.82 | Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner |
| Rating count | 16k | 97k | Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner |
| Tracked keywords | 4 | 5 | Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Tie wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins demand, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has deeper review volume, and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.