Followers Tracker Lite vs Omada - Make Sport Social
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Followers Tracker Lite智华 李 - Social Networking
Omada - Make Sport Social - Social Networking| Metric | Followers Tracker Lite | Omada - Make Sport Social | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Followers Tracker Lite |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Followers Tracker Lite |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Social Networking | Social Networking | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Followers Tracker Lite and Omada - Make Sport Social are compared inside Social Networking with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Followers Tracker Lite leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Followers Tracker Lite wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Followers Tracker Lite wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.