Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks vs Microsoft Planner
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&TasksShenzhen Tomato Software Technology Co., Ltd. - Productivity
Microsoft PlannerMicrosoft Corporation - Productivity| Metric | Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks | Microsoft Planner | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks and Microsoft Planner are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Focus To-Do: Focus Timer&Tasks wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.