Flo Cycle & Period Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$9.0M | ~$16M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Revenue band | $9.0M (point est.) | $16M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~2.0M | ~3.0M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Download band | 2.0M (point est.) | 3.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.75 | 4.81 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Rating count | 1.9M | 365k | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Tracked keywords | 9 | 6 | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Flo Cycle & Period Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Flo Cycle & Period Tracker has about 2.0M monthly downloads and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has about 3.0M, while revenue readouts are $9.0M and $16M. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins the revenue readout, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins demand, Flo Cycle & Period Tracker has deeper review volume, and Flo Cycle & Period Tracker has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.