Flo Cycle & Period Tracker vs AI Calorie Counter by Yazio
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker | AI Calorie Counter by Yazio | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$9.0M | $*** - opens with trial | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Revenue band | $9.0M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~2.0M | $*** - opens with trial | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Download band | 2.0M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.75 | - | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Rating count | 1.9M | - | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Tracked keywords | 9 | 7 | Flo Cycle & Period Tracker |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Flo Cycle & Period Tracker and AI Calorie Counter by Yazio are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Flo Cycle & Period Tracker leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Flo Cycle & Period Tracker wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Flo Cycle & Period Tracker wins demand, Flo Cycle & Period Tracker has deeper review volume, and Flo Cycle & Period Tracker has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.