Fawn: Thrive on GLP-1 vs MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Fawn: Thrive on GLP-1ALL AMERICAN ATLAS LLC - Health & Fitness
MyFitnessPal: Calorie CounterMyFitnessPal, Inc. - Health & Fitness| Metric | Fawn: Thrive on GLP-1 | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$12M | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $12M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~700k | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 700k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.71 | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Rating count | - | 2.3M | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Tracked keywords | — | 20 | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Fawn: Thrive on GLP-1 and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins demand, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has deeper review volume, and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.