Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast vs McGregor FAST
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Fasting Tracker • Easy FastSamtark Pty Ltd - Health & Fitness
McGregor FASTMVMNT Inc. - Health & Fitness| Metric | Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast | McGregor FAST | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | McGregor FAST |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast and McGregor FAST are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and McGregor FAST wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.