Fahlo Animal Tracker vs Paramount+
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Fahlo Animal TrackerFahlo - Entertainment
Paramount+CBS Interactive - Entertainment| Metric | Fahlo Animal Tracker | Paramount+ | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$39M | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $39M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~1.0M | Paramount+ |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 1.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.83 | 4.63 | Fahlo Animal Tracker |
| Rating count | 349k | 898k | Paramount+ |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | Paramount+ |
| Category | Entertainment | Entertainment | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Fahlo Animal Tracker and Paramount+ are compared inside Entertainment with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Paramount+ leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Paramount+ in this pair. Paramount+ wins demand, Paramount+ has deeper review volume, and Paramount+ has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.