Essential Anatomy 5 vs Huckleberry: Baby Tracker
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Essential Anatomy 53D4Medical from Elsevier - Medical
Huckleberry: Baby TrackerHuckleberry Labs Inc. - Medical| Metric | Essential Anatomy 5 | Huckleberry: Baby Tracker | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Huckleberry: Baby Tracker |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Huckleberry: Baby Tracker |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.84 | 4.92 | Huckleberry: Baby Tracker |
| Rating count | 20k | 70k | Huckleberry: Baby Tracker |
| Tracked keywords | — | 3 | Huckleberry: Baby Tracker |
| Category | Medical | Medical | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Essential Anatomy 5 and Huckleberry: Baby Tracker are compared inside Medical with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Huckleberry: Baby Tracker leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Huckleberry: Baby Tracker wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Huckleberry: Baby Tracker wins demand, Huckleberry: Baby Tracker has deeper review volume, and Huckleberry: Baby Tracker has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.