Edits: Video Editor vs Video Saver Offline - Clicha
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Edits: Video EditorInstagram, Inc. - Photo & Video
Video Saver Offline - ClichaYuichi Matsuoka - Photo & Video| Metric | Edits: Video Editor | Video Saver Offline - Clicha | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Edits: Video Editor |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.78 | - | Edits: Video Editor |
| Rating count | 71k | - | Edits: Video Editor |
| Tracked keywords | 7 | — | Edits: Video Editor |
| Category | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Edits: Video Editor and Video Saver Offline - Clicha are compared inside Photo & Video with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Edits: Video Editor leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Video Saver Offline - Clicha in this pair. Edits: Video Editor wins demand, Edits: Video Editor has deeper review volume, and Edits: Video Editor has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.