DiDi Rider: Affordable rides vs PeakFinder
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
DiDi Rider: Affordable ridesDiDi - Travel
PeakFinderPeakFinder GmbH - Travel| Metric | DiDi Rider: Affordable rides | PeakFinder | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | DiDi Rider: Affordable rides |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.76 | 4.71 | DiDi Rider: Affordable rides |
| Rating count | 30k | 12k | DiDi Rider: Affordable rides |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and PeakFinder are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. DiDi Rider: Affordable rides leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for PeakFinder in this pair. DiDi Rider: Affordable rides wins demand, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.