Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Lose It! β Calorie Counter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Cronometer: Calorie CounterCronometer Software Inc - Health & Fitness
Lose It! β Calorie CounterFitNow - Health & Fitness| Metric | Cronometer: Calorie Counter | Lose It! β Calorie Counter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$1.0M | Tie |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $1.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~362k | Cronometer: Calorie Counter |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 362k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.77 | 4.77 | Cronometer: Calorie Counter |
| Rating count | 95k | 768k | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Tracked keywords | 7 | 10 | Lose It! β Calorie Counter |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Lose It! β Calorie Counter are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Tie wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins demand, Lose It! β Calorie Counter has deeper review volume, and Lose It! β Calorie Counter has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.