Core: Fitness & Nutrition vs Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Core: Fitness & NutritionEYC Media Pte Ltd - Health & Fitness
Food & Macro Tracker By FitturFittur - Health & Fitness| Metric | Core: Fitness & Nutrition | Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Core: Fitness & Nutrition and Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Food & Macro Tracker By Fittur wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.