Copilot: Track & Budget Money vs Compoundee
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Copilot: Track & Budget MoneyCopilot Money, Inc. - Finance
CompoundeeGoodHumans - Finance| Metric | Copilot: Track & Budget Money | Compoundee | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Copilot: Track & Budget Money |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Copilot: Track & Budget Money |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.75 | 4.97 | Compoundee |
| Rating count | 30k | 127 | Copilot: Track & Budget Money |
| Tracked keywords | 12 | — | Copilot: Track & Budget Money |
| Category | Finance | Finance | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Copilot: Track & Budget Money and Compoundee are compared inside Finance with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Copilot: Track & Budget Money leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Copilot: Track & Budget Money wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Copilot: Track & Budget Money wins demand, Copilot: Track & Budget Money has deeper review volume, and Copilot: Track & Budget Money has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.