Co–Star Personalized Astrology vs iAquaLink
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Co–Star Personalized AstrologyCo-Star Astrology Society - Lifestyle
iAquaLinkZodiac Pool Systems, Inc. - Lifestyle| Metric | Co–Star Personalized Astrology | iAquaLink | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Co–Star Personalized Astrology |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.79 | - | Co–Star Personalized Astrology |
| Rating count | 205k | - | Co–Star Personalized Astrology |
| Tracked keywords | 3 | — | Co–Star Personalized Astrology |
| Category | Lifestyle | Lifestyle | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Co–Star Personalized Astrology and iAquaLink are compared inside Lifestyle with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Co–Star Personalized Astrology leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Co–Star Personalized Astrology in this pair. Co–Star Personalized Astrology wins demand, Co–Star Personalized Astrology has deeper review volume, and Co–Star Personalized Astrology has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.