Cleaner：スマホクリーンアップ vs Fonts Art - Schriftarten App
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Cleaner：スマホクリーンアップBitInfinite - Utilities
Fonts Art - Schriftarten AppAIBY - Utilities| Metric | Cleaner：スマホクリーンアップ | Fonts Art - Schriftarten App | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Fonts Art - Schriftarten App |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Fonts Art - Schriftarten App |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Cleaner：スマホクリーンアップ and Fonts Art - Schriftarten App are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Fonts Art - Schriftarten App leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Fonts Art - Schriftarten App wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Fonts Art - Schriftarten App wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.