Clean Easily-Storage Cleaner vs Shadowrocket
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Clean Easily-Storage CleanerGuangzhou Chuangxiang Hudong Information Technology Co., Ltd - Utilities
ShadowrocketShadow Launch Technology Limited - Utilities| Metric | Clean Easily-Storage Cleaner | Shadowrocket | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Shadowrocket |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Clean Easily-Storage Cleaner |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.48 | Shadowrocket |
| Rating count | - | 12k | Shadowrocket |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Clean Easily-Storage Cleaner and Shadowrocket are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Clean Easily-Storage Cleaner leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Shadowrocket wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Clean Easily-Storage Cleaner wins demand, Shadowrocket has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.