ClayShare vs Milan Art
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
ClayShareClayShare LLC - Education
Milan ArtMilan Art LLC - Education| Metric | ClayShare | Milan Art | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Milan Art |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Milan Art |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Education | Education | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
ClayShare and Milan Art are compared inside Education with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Milan Art leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Milan Art wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Milan Art wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.