Citymapper: All Live Transit vs MilGPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Citymapper: All Live TransitCitymapper Limited - Navigation
MilGPSCascode Labs Pty Ltd - Navigation| Metric | Citymapper: All Live Transit | MilGPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | MilGPS |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Citymapper: All Live Transit |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.87 | 4.83 | Citymapper: All Live Transit |
| Rating count | 105k | 5.5k | Citymapper: All Live Transit |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Citymapper: All Live Transit and MilGPS are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Citymapper: All Live Transit leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and MilGPS wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Citymapper: All Live Transit wins demand, Citymapper: All Live Transit has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.