Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text vs Paramount+
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Character AI: Chat, Talk, TextCharacter.AI - Entertainment
Paramount+CBS Interactive - Entertainment| Metric | Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text | Paramount+ | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$39M | Paramount+ |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $39M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~1.0M | Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 1.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.29 | 4.63 | Paramount+ |
| Rating count | 549k | 898k | Paramount+ |
| Tracked keywords | 7 | 1 | Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text |
| Category | Entertainment | Entertainment | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text and Paramount+ are compared inside Entertainment with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Paramount+ wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text wins demand, Paramount+ has deeper review volume, and Character AI: Chat, Talk, Text has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.