Card Value Scanner for Pokemon vs Pocket God
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Card Value Scanner for PokemonApp All Day Pty Ltd - Entertainment
Pocket GodBolt Creative - Entertainment| Metric | Card Value Scanner for Pokemon | Pocket God | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Card Value Scanner for Pokemon |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Card Value Scanner for Pokemon |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.30 | Pocket God |
| Rating count | - | 2.8k | Pocket God |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Entertainment | Entertainment | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Card Value Scanner for Pokemon and Pocket God are compared inside Entertainment with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Card Value Scanner for Pokemon leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Card Value Scanner for Pokemon wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Card Value Scanner for Pokemon wins demand, Pocket God has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.