Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor vs PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Canva: AI Video & Photo EditorCanva - Photo & Video
PicCollage: Magic Photo EditorCardinal Blue - Photo & Video| Metric | Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor | PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$33M | $*** - opens with trial | Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor |
| Revenue band | $33M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~5.0M | $*** - opens with trial | Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor |
| Download band | 5.0M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.88 | 4.79 | Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor |
| Rating count | 3.5M | 1.8M | Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor |
| Tracked keywords | 23 | 15 | Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor |
| Category | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor and PicCollage: Magic Photo Editor are compared inside Photo & Video with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor wins demand, Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor has deeper review volume, and Canva: AI Video & Photo Editor has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.