Campio. vs Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Campio.Livabuk Shahbugh - Travel
Flightradar24 | Flight TrackerFlightradar24 AB - Travel| Metric | Campio. | Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.84 | Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker |
| Rating count | - | 645k | Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker |
| Tracked keywords | — | 3 | Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Campio. and Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker wins demand, Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker has deeper review volume, and Flightradar24 | Flight Tracker has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.