Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Cal AI - Calorie TrackerViral Development LLC - Health & Fitness
Foodvisor - AI Calorie CounterFoodvisor - Health & Fitness| Metric | Cal AI - Calorie Tracker | Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Cal AI - Calorie Tracker |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Cal AI - Calorie Tracker |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.80 | 4.59 | Cal AI - Calorie Tracker |
| Rating count | 345k | 16k | Cal AI - Calorie Tracker |
| Tracked keywords | 10 | 4 | Cal AI - Calorie Tracker |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins demand, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has deeper review volume, and Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.