Blixan vs AR Filter: What The Dog Doin
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
BlixanBeatrz Lpez - Photo & Video
AR Filter: What The Dog DoinVOLIO VIET NAM COMPANY LIMITED - Photo & Video| Metric | Blixan | AR Filter: What The Dog Doin | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Blixan |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | AR Filter: What The Dog Doin |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Blixan and AR Filter: What The Dog Doin are compared inside Photo & Video with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. AR Filter: What The Dog Doin leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Blixan wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), AR Filter: What The Dog Doin wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.