BeSoccer: Résultats du Foot vs MLB
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
BeSoccer: Résultats du FootBESOCCER - Sports
MLBMLB - Sports| Metric | BeSoccer: Résultats du Foot | MLB | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | MLB |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.70 | MLB |
| Rating count | - | 881k | MLB |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | MLB |
| Category | Sports | Sports | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
BeSoccer: Résultats du Foot and MLB are compared inside Sports with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. MLB leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for MLB in this pair. MLB wins demand, MLB has deeper review volume, and MLB has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.