Baritastic - Bariatric Tracker vs CVS Health
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Baritastic - Bariatric TrackerMetagenics, Inc. - Medical
CVS HealthCVS Pharmacy - Medical| Metric | Baritastic - Bariatric Tracker | CVS Health | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | CVS Health |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.69 | CVS Health |
| Rating count | - | 1.6M | CVS Health |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Medical | Medical | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Baritastic - Bariatric Tracker and CVS Health are compared inside Medical with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. CVS Health leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for neither app in this pair. CVS Health wins demand, CVS Health has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.