Bacon Work On-Demand vs LinkedIn: Community & Network
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Bacon Work On-DemandBacon Inc. - Business
LinkedIn: Community & NetworkLinkedIn Corporation - Business| Metric | Bacon Work On-Demand | LinkedIn: Community & Network | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | LinkedIn: Community & Network |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.77 | LinkedIn: Community & Network |
| Rating count | - | 642k | LinkedIn: Community & Network |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | LinkedIn: Community & Network |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Bacon Work On-Demand and LinkedIn: Community & Network are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. LinkedIn: Community & Network leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for LinkedIn: Community & Network in this pair. LinkedIn: Community & Network wins demand, LinkedIn: Community & Network has deeper review volume, and LinkedIn: Community & Network has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.