Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping vs MilGPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Avenza Maps: Offline MappingAvenza Systems Inc. - Navigation
MilGPSCascode Labs Pty Ltd - Navigation| Metric | Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping | MilGPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.76 | 4.83 | MilGPS |
| Rating count | 127k | 5.5k | Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping and MilGPS are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping wins demand, Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping has deeper review volume, and Avenza Maps: Offline Mapping has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.