Authenticator App ^ vs Google Authenticator
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Authenticator App ^AUTHENTICATOR APP 2FA AUTH LTD - Utilities
Google AuthenticatorGoogle - Utilities| Metric | Authenticator App ^ | Google Authenticator | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Google Authenticator |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.85 | Google Authenticator |
| Rating count | - | 1.1M | Google Authenticator |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | Google Authenticator |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Authenticator App ^ and Google Authenticator are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Google Authenticator leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Authenticator App ^ in this pair. Google Authenticator wins demand, Google Authenticator has deeper review volume, and Google Authenticator has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.