Aptive Index vs QuickAds - AI Post Creator
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Aptive IndexEQ Squared LLC - Business
QuickAds - AI Post CreatorDrecom LLC - Business| Metric | Aptive Index | QuickAds - AI Post Creator | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Aptive Index |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Aptive Index |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Aptive Index and QuickAds - AI Post Creator are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Aptive Index leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Aptive Index wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Aptive Index wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.