Amino: AI Calorie Tracker vs Streaks
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Amino: AI Calorie TrackerFitcoin - Health & Fitness
StreaksCrunchy Bagel - Health & Fitness| Metric | Amino: AI Calorie Tracker | Streaks | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Amino: AI Calorie Tracker |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Streaks |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.81 | Streaks |
| Rating count | - | 27k | Streaks |
| Tracked keywords | — | 3 | Streaks |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Amino: AI Calorie Tracker and Streaks are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Streaks leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Amino: AI Calorie Tracker wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Streaks wins demand, Streaks has deeper review volume, and Streaks has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.